From 26112352a774737e1ce5580c93654a26c1e82b39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=B6rg=20Frings-F=C3=BCrst?= Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 22:25:29 +0200 Subject: New upstream version 1.1 --- lib/stdbool.in.h | 132 ------------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 132 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 lib/stdbool.in.h (limited to 'lib/stdbool.in.h') diff --git a/lib/stdbool.in.h b/lib/stdbool.in.h deleted file mode 100644 index 03840f1..0000000 --- a/lib/stdbool.in.h +++ /dev/null @@ -1,132 +0,0 @@ -/* Copyright (C) 2001-2003, 2006-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. - Written by Bruno Haible , 2001. - - This file is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify - it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as - published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the - License, or (at your option) any later version. - - This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the - GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. - - You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License - along with this program. If not, see . */ - -#ifndef _GL_STDBOOL_H -#define _GL_STDBOOL_H - -/* ISO C 99 for platforms that lack it. */ - -/* Usage suggestions: - - Programs that use should be aware of some limitations - and standards compliance issues. - - Standards compliance: - - - must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true' - can be used. - - - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1. - - - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false, - as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature". - - Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment: - - - must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used. - - - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro. - - - Bit-fields of type 'bool' are not supported. Portable code - should use 'unsigned int foo : 1;' rather than 'bool foo : 1;'. - - - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are - performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted - to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'. This doesn't work - with this substitute. With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1 - give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'. - - - C99 allows the use of (_Bool)0.0 in constant expressions, but - this substitute cannot always provide this property. - - Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool'; - this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common. */ - - -/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */ - -/* BeOS already #defines false 0, true 1. We use the same - definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them. */ -#if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__ -# include /* defines bool but not _Bool */ -# undef false -# undef true -#endif - -#ifdef __cplusplus -# define _Bool bool -# define bool bool -#else -# if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__ - /* A compiler known to have 'bool'. */ - /* If the compiler already has both 'bool' and '_Bool', we can assume they - are the same types. */ -# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ -typedef bool _Bool; -# endif -# else -# if !defined __GNUC__ - /* If @HAVE__BOOL@: - Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when - the built-in _Bool type is used. See - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html - https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html - https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html - Similar bugs are likely with other compilers as well; this file - wouldn't be used if was working. - So we override the _Bool type. - If !@HAVE__BOOL@: - Need to define _Bool ourselves. As 'signed char' or as an enum type? - Use of a typedef, with SunPRO C, leads to a stupid - "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99". - Use of an enum type, with IRIX cc, leads to a stupid - "warning(1185): enumerated type mixed with another type". - Even the existence of an enum type, without a typedef, - "Invalid enumerator. (badenum)" with HP-UX cc on Tru64. - The only benefit of the enum, debuggability, is not important - with these compilers. So use 'signed char' and no enum. */ -# define _Bool signed char -# else - /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it. */ -# if !@HAVE__BOOL@ - /* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as - enum constants, not only as macros. - It is tempting to write - typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; - so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But then - values of type '_Bool' might promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int' - (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int' - (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)). So add a negative value to the - enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'. */ -typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; -# endif -# endif -# endif -# define bool _Bool -#endif - -/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives. */ -#ifdef __cplusplus -# define false false -# define true true -#else -# define false 0 -# define true 1 -#endif - -#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1 - -#endif /* _GL_STDBOOL_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3